Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Cricket and Immorality

Sports resembles life in infinite ways. The good, the bad and the ugly of our society and culture are all displayed, in varying degrees on the sports fields. So, when we live in a world, where corruption is a fact of life, where crime is all around us, it will be naive to expect our sporting fields to be free of them.
Now, whenever a sporting scandal happens, I find that it often gets disproportionate media attention and coverage.  Which brings me to question, whether something like spot fixing on the cricket field is more worthy of attention than the day to day bribery which happen in our government offices for instance ? And secondly is it fair for us to expect our sportsmen to be on a higher plane of morality, or more incorruptible than the average man on the street ?
Anyway, moving on let me look at the various forms of cheating/ immorality that happens on our sports fields. For I find that certain forms are more reprehensible than others. Or to look at it differently, some are far more easier to understand and even empathise with than others.
1) Cheating done to help your own team in the natural course of play: Many, many examples come to my mind, but I will stick mainly to cricket for examples. For most of us, we  relate to it best.  Batsman gets a faint knick through to the keeper and doesn't walk off. Rather he waits for the umpire's decision and let's say 1 in 5 times he gets away with it and continues to bat. Or a fielder claims a catch which he knows to be a bump ball. Or appealing for a wicket when you know the batsman is not out. Somewhat similar to a handball on the football field. Or diving to win a freekick or penalty. Or doing what is termed as a professional foul. Now strictly speaking this can be termed as something wrong which is done by our players.Often the argument made by people in their defence is they play to the whistle or the umpire's decision. And there is some merit in the argument. For if there is a batsman who walks when his team is 210/1 but doesn't when 20 runs are required to win with just two wickets remaining, then he is simply misusing his image as a "walker". Now, when a cricketer does any of these things on the field, which are some form of cheating, he is opening himself up to criticism. My own take is that I understand why a player would do that, and at the end of the day it has been done to benefit or help your own team - so be it. I shall not lose sleep over arguments that cricket is a gentleman's game etc etc. Fact of life - so move on.
2) Well Planned cheating/ strategy done in a systematic manner to help your own team: Two examples from cricket that come to my mind straightaway - Bodyline and ball tampering. There was definitely a sense of pre-determination in both of them, an effort to bend the rules and derive maximum advantage of the situation and playing conditions. Perhaps these are more condemnable than category one. And while I don't subsribe to them, but still I can understand what is the purpose - which is to help your team and win. Systematic and targetted sledging can also be an example here - but then we can just call it attempts to mentally disintegrate the opposition and walk away
3) Immoral activities/ corruption to "screw" your own team: In other words, things like match fixing. Where players take money to underperform and lose a match. I find this to be most disturbing and absolutely unpardonable. For this has no greater objective or goal in mind i.e. winning a match for your team. Rather, the player is letting down millions of fans/ countrymen. The financial incentives for doing that make it comparable with any financial fraudulent activity which people in the corporate world indulgem. But as a sports fan, I find this category of cheats most disgusting.
4) Trivial and ridiculous incidents which have no greater purpose in mind: And this brings me to the incidents which have happened in the cricket world in the last two months. The Suraj Randiv no ball (assuming it was intentional) to deny an opposition batsman a century. Or the latest spot fixing where the Paki players are making a quick buck by bowling a no-ball or playing out a maiden over. Frankly in my opinion, these are trivial and ridiculous.
This incident of spot fixing is something which made me laugh a lot. And on deeper thoughts the main persons being cheated out there are the "honest" people who are laying bets on these little events of a cricket match. The beauty of betting is that you are making an attempt to predict correctly events which are uncertain, by spot fixing such things the uncertainty involved is being removed, "the sanctity" of a bet is being compromised :).
Anyway, coming back to these incidents in general, I fail to see why 24 hour news channels should be working themselves up in an indignant fury. The only worry is whether these incidents are just the tip of an iceberg of match fixing, but then they can't be determined in a television studio, can they ?
As mentioned before, of all the forms of sporting corruption, what has disturbed me the most has been match fixing. For let us not kid ourselves, sports is a serious business and sporting stars are our heroes. Ten years ago, the match fixing scandals had left me a very disturbed and sad individual. And then I had found my redemption in the 2001 India - Australia series and since then cricket had been good fun once again. This time, the older and perhaps more cynical person in me has found these incidents trivial and rather than being shocked and saddened, I have merely shrugged a shoulder.
And one last thing. I just hope the all the people out there criticising the corrupt cricketers on TV and on the internet are the types who never fudge medical bills, pay their taxes fully and never pay a bribe to get things done for themselves.
PS: There has been still been some good stuff written by bloggers about this latest spot fixing controversy, which are well worth a read - so here's some of them: Greatbong in his typical style, Anthony Chettup on Short of a Length (where you get other nice links as well) and an extremely serious and moving piece from Venkat Ananth. I highly recommend reading them.


  1. Nice one Abhi ... once again a very good post.. :):)

  2. Beautiful piece on the "sanctity of betting". A balanced, practical view on the circus going on. You may have also wanted to mention the 'underarm' incident in point 2, no?

  3. Thanks for your comments Priyesh and Suhel. And yes, I thought about the underarm incident.... just not sure where to put it in. I guess point 2 is correct....

  4. Quality again Paul.

    While You have given reasons for having point 1 and 2 in this post- I dont believe they belong in the same story let alone the same page.

    Point 1 is a no brainer- I would recommend we do it over and over again.the one's who complain about it are either sore losers or are being wise on hindsight.
    as for point 2- well, Having copied in exams - i cant really get all moralistic here and condemn it. My take is simple- the refrees, the umpires and the administrators are there for a reason. If one is willing to take on the system and try to bend and stretch the rules- it's an individuals call. like you rightly said, at the end of the day - you are doing it for the greater good of your team and not letting down your team or people who are counting on you.

    No arguments on point 3 - disgarceful disgusting cunts. these assholes deserve to burn in hell! I rarely get moralistic about things, however, internal sabotage is one things tht gets me all wound up...

    point 4- well if you look at it only the consequence is immaterial. in terms of intent they fall in2 the 1st 3 categories. and i would judge it based on that.

    P.S. - just a thght for AAmer. he is just a kid at 17 years of age. I am not sure wht his background is and whether he is wise enough to knw what he is doing.

    the rest are certified jerks.!

  5. To sum up, a player is expected to do whatever is within his control to take his team to victory. But where i disagree slightly is the fact that you put spot fixing in Point 4. Even players who take money to underperform do not necessarily affect the result of the game. And if a player who agrees to spot fixing will eventually get to underperforming as well. Any form of paid underperformance even if it is for a ball or for the entire game cannot be condoned.

    And see what impact this spot fixing incident has had on the minds. Immediately after this revelation, people started putting two and two together and started wondering whether the Randiv incident was a case of spot fixing as well. Somebody maybe had bet against Sehwag century...What i mean is any form of fixing spot or match destroys the already tarnished credibility of the game.

    Now can you say with any sort of certainity that the IPL games where not even the respective countries are involved, these same players are not inclined to spot fix (i am not getting into whether it is for the owners or not).

    This fixing incident with the already existing problem of overdose reaffirms my belief that IPL was the beginning of the decline of the sport in our country. Only time will tell.

  6. hey Im taking part in the indiblogger contest and i need ur vote...

    please do read my post and vote for it. I bet you will like it... :-)

    in the only blogger from mangalore to reach the top 3... with ur vote i can come second... please help me out... thanks :-)


Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. Copy Pasting from this site is allowed only if you give credits. Ok ?